Attitudes towards interracial marriages in Southern Africa

Attitudes towards interracial marriages in South Africa

Picture: Amy of motherinthemix

June, not merely February, can be a month that is important commemorate love. In specific, for love that transcends inter- and outer-group obstacles. On 12th June 2017 marked fifty years because the U.S. Supreme Court ruled when you look at the Loving v. Virginia instance that wedding across racial lines had been appropriate through the united states (United States Of America), wiping laws and regulations that prohibited such marriages in a few states during the time1. In Southern Africa, wedding and sexual relationships between historically defined competition groups were likewise prohibited by the Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act (Act No 55 of 1949) while the Immorality Act of 1950. These anti-miscegenation regulations had been introduced by the apartheid federal federal federal government and formed element of its policy that is overall of, including items of legislation including the populace registration and Group Areas Act. The Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act had been ultimately repealed in June 1985 – because of the Immorality and Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Amendment Act – permitting marriages that are inter-racial relationships2. That 12 months, Suzanne Leclerc and Protas Madlala became the couple that is first different historically defined battle teams to have hitched in South Africa following the change3.

A lot more than three years later on, research carried out by scientists at North-West University in Mahikeng show that the chances of and individual marrying some body associated with the race that is same by themselves reduced from 303:1 in 1996, to 95:1 in 2011 – thus, an increase in interracial marriages in Southern Africa. The scientists attribute this to at least one) “general alterations in attitudes in culture”; and, 2) “mutual tolerance” of people from different historically defined competition teams in South Africa4.

Intergroup marriages are believed a significant way of measuring the dissolution of social and social obstacles, consequently of social and integration that is cultural. Despite coming from variable backgrounds, lovers in intergroup ( right right right here interracial) marriages will likely share some typical values and aspirations. These elements are noticed become enabling of social cohesion in multicultural societies5. Nevertheless, not merely the chances of interracial marriages, but also attitudes towards interracial marriages are worth focusing on whenever intergroup that is considering as being a way of measuring integration.

For this end, we could utilize information through the South African Reconciliation Barometer (SARB). One of many concerns within the SARB survey asks participants if they would accept, disapprove or are neutral should an in depth relative of theirs marry some body from another type of competition team. This types part of a summary of concerns in terms of attitudes towards racial integration in a variety of contexts, which include marriage that is interracial integration in school and integration in neighbourhoods. Among these inter-racial wedding ended up being regularly the smallest amount of authorized regarding the list supplied from 2003-20136.

Taking a look at the findings especially associated with attitudes towards interracial wedding, Figure 1 below demonstrates that approval prices initially increased from 47% in 2003 to 53per cent this season, decreasing once again to 47per cent from 2010 to 2015. The percentage of participants whom suggested which they disapprove of a close relative marrying someone from another historically defined race group decreased from 29% in 2003 to 23% in 2015 that they neither approve nor disapprove (or are neutral) increased from 21% in 2003 to 26% in 2015; and, the proportion of respondents who indicated.

Figure 1: Southern Africa: Attitudes towards inter-racial wedding, 2003-2015, complete Population1

Overall, good modification (albeit incremental) when it comes to approval of the close relative marrying an individual from another competition team has happened – as can be viewed into the reduction in disapproval, plus the rise in basic reactions. Nonetheless, much works lies ahead in tackling prejudices in this respect – in specific because of the reported higher likelihood of interracial marriages, while attitudes have already been slow to regulate.

For an even more in depth analysis and disaggregation of reactions with regards to historically defined battle teams, age ranges, residing Standard Measures (LSM) and Highest degree of Education attained, please see our SARB report about this subject under magazines during July 2017.

Elnari Potgieter may be the venture Leader for the Southern Africa Reconciliation Barometer at IJR

1 Wilkinson, A. 2017. Loving v. Virginia was decided 50 years back, VOX, 17 2017 june. On The Web:

2 South African History Online (SAHO). 2016. The Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act commences. On The Web:

3 Johnson, M. 1986. South Africa’s 1st Legal Mixed-Race few permitted to Marry, Not to call home Together, l . a . Circumstances, 13 July 1986. On The Web:

4 Jacobson, C.K., Amoateng, A.Y., & Heaton, T.B. 2004. Inter-racial marriages in Southern Africa, Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 35(3): 443-459.

5 Khoo, S. 2011. Integration and Multiculturalism: A Demographic Attitude. Chapter 6 in Multiculturalism and Integration: A Harmonious Relationship, Michael Clyne, James Jupp (eds). ANU Press.

6 Wale, K., Foster, D. 2015. Contact and Reconciliation, Chapter 4 in Rethinking Reconciliation: proof from Southern Africa, Lefko-Everett, K., Govender, R., Foster, D (eds). HSRC Press, Cape Town.

7 in most circumstances: “Not applicable” had been rendered “Missing”; “Strongly Disapprove” and “Disapprove” combined to form “Disapprove”. “Strongly Approve” and “Approve” combined to make ‘Approve”. “Neutral” in certain years framed as “Neither disapprove nor approve”. For decades up to 2006 issue known folks from all the teams (other to this associated with respondent); from 2006 onwards participants had been first asks exactly just what group that is racialapart from their particular) the respondent find hard to keep company with. This concerns will be followed with questions relating to integration with reference to the mentioned group.